Re: IMAP REPLACE extension

"Adrien de Croy" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imapext
Message-ID <em344e559b-a501-4977-9486-12516529a282@bodybag>
REPLACE wraps APPEND which has a mailbox name as an argument.  Therefore 
REPLACE must also have this argument and that's also why it's an 
authenticated-state command and not a selected-state command.

Adrien


------ Original Message ------
From: "Pete Maclean" <[email protected]>
To: "Stu Brandt" <[email protected]>; "'[email protected]'" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: 6/05/2015 6:35:58 a.m.
Subject: Re: [imapext] IMAP REPLACE extension

>Stu,
>
>This is a good start indeed but I find a few things to mention.
>
>Is UID REPLACE valid in the authenticated state?  My assumption would 
>be that it is but it might be good for the text to make that explicit.
>
>Can REPLACE be used to replace a message in a mailbox other than the 
>one the client has selected?  Surely it should not be.  Which perhaps 
>suggests that REPLACE should not have a mailbox-name argument.
>
>The penultimate paragraph in section 3.4 strikes me as awkward and 
>unclear.
>
>There is a typo ("replacment") in the first paragraph of the Abstract.
>
>Pete Maclean
>
>_______________________________________________
>imapext mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.