Re: IMAP REPLACE extension
"Adrien de Croy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <em344e559b-a501-4977-9486-12516529a282@bodybag> |
REPLACE wraps APPEND which has a mailbox name as an argument. Therefore REPLACE must also have this argument and that's also why it's an authenticated-state command and not a selected-state command. Adrien ------ Original Message ------ From: "Pete Maclean" <[email protected]> To: "Stu Brandt" <[email protected]>; "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Sent: 6/05/2015 6:35:58 a.m. Subject: Re: [imapext] IMAP REPLACE extension >Stu, > >This is a good start indeed but I find a few things to mention. > >Is UID REPLACE valid in the authenticated state? My assumption would >be that it is but it might be good for the text to make that explicit. > >Can REPLACE be used to replace a message in a mailbox other than the >one the client has selected? Surely it should not be. Which perhaps >suggests that REPLACE should not have a mailbox-name argument. > >The penultimate paragraph in section 3.4 strikes me as awkward and >unclear. > >There is a typo ("replacment") in the first paragraph of the Abstract. > >Pete Maclean > >_______________________________________________ >imapext mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext