Re: Review for first draft for draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:28:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jamie, > On 23 Jul 2015, at 19:41, Jamie Nicolson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Section 3.2: This section seems to imply that the extended list syntax for STATUS APPENDLIMIT must be supported by any server that advertises the APPENDLIMIT capability, regardless of whether it supports LIST-EXTENDED and LIST-STATUS. That is my preference. > I think we should clarify that this section will only apply to servers that support LIST-EXTENDED, LIST-STATUS, and APPENDLIMIT. Supporting the new syntax might be non-trivial, and will be wasted work for servers that don't support per-mailbox limits (see below). Can you elaborate on why handling one extra STATUS attribute name is complicated for you? _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext