Re: Review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-03

Hi Alexey,
At 11:57 03-10-2015, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>As 
><https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4549/referencedby/>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4549/referencedby/ 
>shows 3 Standard Track RFCs pointing to RFC 4549, it can be added 
>into the downref registry. I suggest you just mention that in the writeup.
>
>This reference can also be moved to Informative, because of how RFC 
>4549 is used.

Thanks for verifying the RFC 4549.  The three references are 
informative, i.e. it's not a downref.  I'll suggest using RFC 4549 as 
an Informative reference if the working group is okay with that.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext