Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt
Jayantheesh S B <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:46:11 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi All, I will be publishing the next version of the draft with Alexey's comments addressed today. Kindly let me know, if anything needs to be changed in the next version. SM, Kindly check this version and make sure all of your concerns are addressed. Regards, Jay -----Original Message----- From: Jayantheesh S B Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:01 AM To: Jayantheesh S B; Alexey Melnikov; [email protected] Subject: RE: [imapext] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt Hi All, Apart from Alexey's comments, if anybody has any comments, kindly share it to conclude the draft. Regards, Jay -----Original Message----- From: imapext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jayantheesh S B Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:16 AM To: Alexey Melnikov; [email protected] Subject: Re: [imapext] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt Hi Alexey, Thanks for reviewing the document. We will wait for other comments as well and address your review comments in the next version of the document. Regards, Jay -----Original Message----- From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 8:23 AM To: Jayantheesh S B; [email protected] Subject: Re: [imapext] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-04.txt Hi Jay, On 07/10/2015 23:08, Jayantheesh S B wrote: > Hi All, > > Please find the updated IMAP APPENDLIMIT draft version 04 with SM's and Timo's review comments addressed. > > Kindly go through the same and share your response. The changes mostly look good, but one thing I would like to discuss: > 2. APPENDLIMIT Extension > > > An IMAP server that supports APPENDLIMIT extension advertises this by > including the name APPENDLIMIT in its capability list. IMAP server > SHOULD advertise this capability after user has logged in. I was thinking that this would be better as a MAY, because it alerts implementations to the possibility, but doesn't have any effect in interoperability. Clients need to handle that no matter when the capability is sent. > IMAP server > can publish the APPENDLIMIT capability in two formats. _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext