Re: Review - draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:32:43 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, At 13:48 03-11-2015, Jayantheesh S B wrote: >We have addressed all the review comments as part of >draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05. > >As well we have discussed all the issues and the solution in >detail. Shall we take this draft to next stage? I'll comment about the discussion of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05 [1]. The following comment from Arnt Gulbrandsen caught my attention [2]: "IMO the document should answer this particular question". Arnt was referring to the question from Timo Sirainen [3]: "Why implement something that going to be a problem in only some very rare cases?" There was a message from Stu Brandt in which he mentioned that there is an implementation [4]. There was another comment from Arnt: "Make it seem as if the value of the implementation exceeds the effort to implement" [5]. Adrien de Croy mentioned that: "At the moment for us appendlimit looks to have negative value overall, and we don't plan to implement" [6]. There was a comment from Jayantheesh about the using this extension in cases where the user attaches a big file and save the mail to their Drafts folder [7]. I view the "unnecessary resource usage" in the Introduction Section as a way to answer to the question. Would that convince people to implement this extension? On one hand there is a part of this working group is not convinced that it is worthwhile to implement this extension. On the other hand, there is an implementation and another part of this working group is okay with the draft. In my opinion, there is rough consensus on this draft. The next step is for me to do the document shepherd write-up for the Area Director. The Area Director will review and comment about the draft. Regards, S. Moonesamy (as imapapdb WG Chair) 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05 2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05570.html 3. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05562.html 4. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05507.html 5. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05585.html 6. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05589.html 7. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05595.html _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext