Re: Review - draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05

Naren <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:54:46 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.imapext
Message-ID <CAHC+rVHtn8+Po2YZKxHVXcKaavCkyQ-++TY236C-NuS8qzPkRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alexey,



Thanks for your review comments.



Please find the updated text below. Kindly review and share your views.



This extension provides server admins with the capability to configure the
maximum append limit size they will be expecting from the client. IMAP
server side processing of huge attachments above the available can be
avoided to a great extent, if this extension is supported at the IMAP
client.



Thanks & Regards

- Naren

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Jay,
>
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 20:30, Jayantheesh S B <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear SM,
>
>
>
> Please find the updated text below. Kindly review and share your comments.
>
>
>
> 1. Introduction
>
>
>
> Several IMAP server have limitation for mail upload size which is not
>
> published to the email client.  When email client APPEND a mail with
>
> huge attachments, it fails due to size restriction set by the IMAP
>
> server.  This results in unnecessary resource usage.  Especially in the
>
> mobile device environment, appending mail with huge attachment consumes
>
> device resources like device battery power and mobile data.
>
>
>
> The IMAP APPENDLIMIT extension provides an ability to advertise maximum
>
> upload size allowed by the IMAP server, so that email client knows the
>
> size limitation beforehand.
>
>
>
> This extension provides server admins with the capability to configure the
> maximum append limit size they will be expecting from the client. By
> implementing this extension, IMAP server side processing of huge
> attachments above the available limit from the IMAP client can be avoided
> to a great extent.
>
>
> This is an improvement. This doesn't help if the client doesn't support
> the extension, but in the context of this document this is probably
> obvious, so doesn't need saying. (I was just wondering whether "the IMAP
> client" in the last sentence is clear or needs clarifying.)
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: imapext [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:00 AM
> To: Jayantheesh S B; Narendra Singh Bisht; [email protected]
> Cc: Alexey Melnikov
> Subject: Re: [imapext] Review -
> draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05
>
>
>
> Hi Jay, Naren
>
> At 13:39 11-11-2015, Jayantheesh S B wrote:
>
> >As you mentioned, we will add few words about the benefits of IMAP
>
> >Server as well.
>
>
>
> There is the following text in the Introduction Section of
>
> draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-05:
>
>
>
>    "This results in unnecessary resource usage.  Especially in the
>
>     mobile device environment, appending mail with huge attachment
>
>     consumes device resources like device battery power and mobile data."
>
>
>
> I read that as: this results in unnecessary usage in the mobile device
> environment as it increases the consumption of device battery power and
> mobile data, i.e. it only benefits IMAP clients in a mobile environment.
>
>
>
> Could you post some text about how the extension might help the IMAP
> server to the mailing list?  The Working Group can then discuss about that
> text and agree on what text to add.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> S. Moonesamy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> imapext mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext
>
> _______________________________________________
> imapext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards
-Narendra

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext