Re: Referencing RFC 2088

Hi Jay, Naren,
At 07:37 08-12-2015, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>I slightly prefer to have a reference to 
>draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis, but if 
>draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis takes too long (we can discuss what 
>exactly that means ;-)), I would be Ok with switching back to RFC 2088.

As nobody else expressed a preference I suggest changing the 
reference from RFC 2088 to draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis.  As a note 
for myself, I'll have to update the document shepherd write-up to explain this.

There is a comment from Adrien de Croy at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05639.html 
Could you please reply to that comment?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd) 

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext