Re: AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)

Hi SM,

We can rephrase that sentence to

"IMAP server MAY advertise this CAPABILITY before or after user has logged
in.The client SHOULD be ready to handle this CAPABILITY irrespective of
user authenticated state"

We do not see any implications in this being advertised before user logged
in.
Can you elaborate more about your concern on this.

Thanks

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, S Moonesamy <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Naren,
> At 07:52 10-12-2015, Naren wrote:
>
>> Our MAY means
>> (a) The IMAP server can advertise this capability before the user has
>> logged in.
>> OR
>> (b) The IMAP server can advertise this capability after the user has
>> logged in.
>>
>
> Based on the AD review [1] and the short discussion about that sentence in
> Section 2, my opinion is that the intent of the what is written in the
> draft is not clear.  What are the implications of (a) and (b)?  What if the
> IMAP server advertises that there is a limit which applies to all mailboxes
> before the user has logged in?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
>
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05633.html
>



-- 
Thanks & Regards
-Narendra

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext