Re: AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:39:51 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/12/2015 18:24, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Naren, > At 09:15 10-12-2015, Naren wrote: >> We can rephrase that sentence to >> >> "IMAP server MAY advertise this CAPABILITY before or after user has >> logged in.The client SHOULD be ready to handle this CAPABILITY >> irrespective of user authenticated state" >> >> We do not see any implications in this being advertised before user >> logged in. >> Can you elaborate more about your concern on this. > > By implications, I meant: > > (i) What are the advantages of advertising the upload limit before > the user > has logged in? A server can advertise a limit which applies to all or most users. > (ii) What are the disadvantages of advertising the upload limit > before the > user has logged in? Other than a few extra bytes in the initial CAPABILITY, there are no disadvantages I can think of. _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext