Re: AD review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-06 (Section 2)
Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:42:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi SM, On 10/12/2015 20:34, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Alexey, Naren, > At 09:19 10-12-2015, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> The it means that the limit applies to all users. However the server >> can also return another limit for some users after logging in, which >> will override the globally announced limit. So it is not OR, but AND/OR. > > This is from Section 2: > > C: t1 CAPABILITY > S: * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 ID APPENDLIMIT=257890 > S: t1 OK foo > > The explanation (above that text in the draft) says that 257890 is for > all mailboxes. In Section 3 there is the following: > > "IMAP server can have mailbox specific APPENDLIMIT value, which > will not be advertised as part of CAPABILITY response." > > Won't the IMAP client assume that the IMAP server would not have > advertised "257890" as the limit if there is a mailbox specific > APPENDLIMIT value? Right, if the server has different limits for different mailboxes, it would have advertised just "APPENDLIMIT". I was talking about APPENDLIMIT=<n> being returned before and after authentication and what it means. See my reply to Dave. Best Regards, Alexey _______________________________________________ imapext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext