Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:40:19 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imapext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Naren, Jay,
At 15:15 06-01-2016, Ben Campbell wrote:
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>- section 2, last paragraph:
>
>It was not obvious to me if "An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both
>formats. " meant both STATUS and LIST, or both global and per-mailbox. I
>assume the former.
In the first paragraph of Section 2 there is the following:
"An IMAP server can publish the APPENDLIMIT capability in two
formats."
There are then two examples of the formats. In the last paragraph of
Section 2 there is:
"An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both formats."
Does that refer to the two examples in Section 2?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)
_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext