Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben,
At 15:15 06-01-2016, Ben Campbell wrote:
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>- section 2, last paragraph:
>
>It was not obvious to me if "An IMAP client SHOULD be able to parse both
>formats. " meant both STATUS and LIST, or both global and per-mailbox. I
>assume the former.

Thanks for the review.  I am waiting for a reply from the authors.

I previously commented that the "both formats" would be covered by 
the ABNF (Section 5).  The normative language in that sentence is 
incorrect though [1].

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/current/msg05633.html 

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext