Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi SM,

On 07/01/2016 17:09, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Jay, Alexey,
>
> At 08:41 07-01-2016, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> SHOULD implies that it is possible for the client not to parse one of 
>> the variants in some circumstances. I think not using normative 
>> language is better here (or switch to MUST).
>
> Yes.  I don't think that using normative language is appropriate in 
> that sentence.
>
> At 08:28 07-01-2016, Jayantheesh S B wrote:
>> IMAP client implementing this extension, should be capable to parse 
>> both Mailbox-specific and Global APPENDLIMIT response.
>>
>> IMAP client ignoring one format may result in non-compliance to this 
>> extension. To stress that point we have added RFC 2119 "SHOULD" in 
>> that sentence.
>
> I'll suggest the following text:
>
>   An IMAP client implementing this extension should be able to parse both
>   mailbox-specific and global APPENDLIMIT responses.
+1.

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext