Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Hi Barry,

On 9 Jan 2016, at 22:27, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:

>> We are fine with the proposed text. We will update the draft with this
>> text and release a new version (10).
> 
> Great; thanks.  I'd like to hear from a couple of others to make sure
> it's OK with a few more people.  Alexey, SM, can the two of you weigh
> in?

Changes in -09 and -10 look good to me.
> 
> Barry
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: imapext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
>> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 7:31 PM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; The IESG; SM
>> Subject: Re: [imapext] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08: (with COMMENT)
>> 
>> Authors and working group:
>> In light of this discussion, I suggest that we replace the content of the Security Considerations section with this:
>> 
>> NEW
>>   This extension provides additional information that cooperative
>>   clients can use as an optimization, and does not introduce new
>>   security concerns.  This extension does not address abusive clients
>>   that intend to consume server resources, and servers will still have
>>   to take action to disconnect and/or restrict access to clients that
>>   exhibit abusive behavior.
>> END
>> 
>> Please comment, and if there are no objections, please make the change in another revision.  Thanks.
>> 
>> Barry
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I was just suggesting that you could cut out the scenario, leave the
>>> last sentence and say it's because of a possible attack on resources,
>>> 'resources' being a short way of describing the scenario laid out.  If
>>> some other attack comes out that is mitigated in a similar way that
>>> uses 'resources' in another way, you are covered.  It also gets rid of
>>> the extra text that I don't see as necessary.  But leave it if you
>>> think it's fine.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> imapext mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> imapext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext

_______________________________________________
imapext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext