RE: [Simple] Status summary
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In Jabber we handle this with the concept of a "resource" -- one Jabber Entity (normally user@host) can possess multiple resources associated with different connection types or locations (e.g., user@host/cellphone and user@host/desktop), there is no limit on the number of simultaneous connected resources that may be associated with a Jabber Entity, and each resource can have a distinct presence status. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre email+jabber: [email protected] On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Boyer, David G (Dave) wrote: > I am curious about something. How would you catagorize present > but on the phone? You may not be available for a SIP audio session, but > you would be available for an IM. Different presence states for diff > communication channels? > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Olson [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:54 PM > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Avshalom Houri > > Subject: Re: [Simple] Status summary > > > > > > There seems to be a common thread here where > > we can map communication status (presence) to > > one of three states: > > > > open, > > closed, > > undisclosed (invisible) > > > > Is there a fourth type of state I am missing? > > > > /sean > > > > > > > > ===== > > Sean Olson <[email protected]> > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > simple mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.dynamicsoft.com/mailman/listinfo/simple > > > > > > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please] > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]