RE: PIDF - some things left out of draft

your workding sounds good to me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroyasu Sugano [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:11 PM
> To: Carr, Wayne; [email protected]; 'Graham Klyne'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PIDF - some things left out of draft
> 
> 
> Wayne,
> 
> Thanks very much for your comments.  Most of the issues 2 and 
> 3 are reflected
> in the coming draft.  I have one comment.
> 
> > Section 4.1.3, the first sentence of the first paragraph 
> should be changed
> > to: "The <status> element contains 0 or 1 OPTIONAL <basic> elements,
> > followed by 0 or more OPTIONAL extension elements from 
> other namespaces."
> 
> This statement seems to allow the <status> element with no 
> values, which is
> not allowed in the present draft.  If we go with this 
> restriction, the sentence above
> would be like:
> 
>   The <status> element contains 0 or 1 OPTIONAL <basic> elements,
>   followed by 0 or more OPTIONAL extension elements from 
> other namespaces,
>   under the restriction that at least one child element 
> appears in the <status>
> element.
> 
> If you have better wording, please post it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> -- Hiroyasu Sugano
> 
> 


  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]