RE: PIDF - some things left out of draft

Yes, that's a good change.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroyasu Sugano [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 3:22 AM
> To: Paul Kyzivat; Carr, Wayne
> Cc: [email protected]; 'Graham Klyne'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PIDF - some things left out of draft
> 
> 
> Thanks Paul.
> 
> > This is a nit, so feel free to ignore:
> > 
> > In 
> >    "The <status> element contains 0 or 1 OPTIONAL <basic>
> >    elements, followed by 0 or more OPTIONAL extension elements
> >    from other namespaces."
> > 
> > isn't the wording "0 or * OPTIONAL" redundant?
> > Wouldn't it be just as precise and more concise to say:
> > 
> >    "The <status> element contains 1 OPTIONAL <basic>
> >    element, followed by any number of OPTIONAL extension
> >    elements from other namespaces."
> 
> Well, this wording sounds better to me. 
> 
> Wayne, if you have no problem, I would modify all of such 
> wordings as suggested. 
> Okay?
> 
> 
> -- Hiroyasu Sugano
> 
> 
> > Paul
> > 
> > "Carr, Wayne" wrote:
> > > 
> > > your workding sounds good to me.
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hiroyasu Sugano [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:11 PM
> > > > To: Carr, Wayne; [email protected]; 'Graham Klyne'; 
> [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: PIDF - some things left out of draft
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Wayne,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks very much for your comments.  Most of the issues 2 and
> > > > 3 are reflected
> > > > in the coming draft.  I have one comment.
> > > >
> > > > > Section 4.1.3, the first sentence of the first paragraph
> > > > should be changed
> > > > > to: "The <status> element contains 0 or 1 OPTIONAL 
> <basic> elements,
> > > > > followed by 0 or more OPTIONAL extension elements from
> > > > other namespaces."
> > > >
> > > > This statement seems to allow the <status> element with no
> > > > values, which is
> > > > not allowed in the present draft.  If we go with this
> > > > restriction, the sentence above
> > > > would be like:
> > > >
> > > >   The <status> element contains 0 or 1 OPTIONAL <basic> 
> elements,
> > > >   followed by 0 or more OPTIONAL extension elements from
> > > > other namespaces,
> > > >   under the restriction that at least one child element
> > > > appears in the <status>
> > > > element.
> > > >
> > > > If you have better wording, please post it.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Hiroyasu Sugano
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > >   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> discussions, please]
> > 
> > 
> >   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> discussions, please]
> > 
> > 
> 


  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]