Re: status of wg specifications

[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.impp
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Given Mark Day's coments about that fact that CPIM has not received
the working group last call, I reinstate the comments I made about
CPIM and expand my focus to include them.

John

[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) writes:

> I seem to have lost my focus.  Given that CPIM is a done deal, I
> should not have revisited my complaints about it. ...


  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.