Re: datetime - was -> RE: status of wg specifications

We discussed this a short while ago, without clear conclusion.  datetime is 
being used in specifications other than CPIM.

Whatever the outcome for the datetime draft, I think it would be sensible 
for the PIDF draft to specify/emphasize that "T" and "Z" in datetime values 
must be restricted to upper case.  I believe this will be covered in the 
latest PIDF draft.

#g
--

At 07:56 AM 5/14/02 -0700, Carr, Wayne wrote:
>In DATETIME, there was the problem that it allowed use of either 'T' or 't'
>and 'Z' or 'z'.  That makes it incompatible with the XML Schema dateTime.
>Removing one sentence in the ID is all that it would take to make it so only
>'T' and 'Z' is allowed.

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<[email protected]>



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]