Re: CPIM and URIs (summary)

I'm not sure that there is a compelling reason to base the syntax on the 
email documents.

My inclination would be to define an email-address-like syntax within the 
CPIM specs, allowing UTF-8 in the local part (also the domain part if IDN 
looks like going that way), and applying minimal restrictions to make it 
URI-friendly.  Something like my previous message.

#g
--

At 07:36 AM 5/29/02 -0400, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
>SPECIFIC CHANGE REQUEST
>
>Let me suggest that the mailbox component of an instant inbox URI and
>a presence use the definition in RFC 2822, not the one in RFC 822, and
>that all the text be changed to be consistent with this modification.

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<[email protected]>



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]