RE: Call for objections: subscription/notification security

On 07 June 2002 21:52, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Finally, this group needs to finish. We've already been suffering
> because of constantly changing documents and formats over a long
period 
> of time. Indeed, as you know MS shipped windows with an old version of

> the PIDF specification. I would much rather finish what we have now,
and 
> then revisit the need for this down the road.

I agree with Jonathan. While it is important to recognise that what we
produce will be adopted and used for some time to come, we don't have to
support absolutely everything in the first version and it is true that
we've dropped a considerable amount in this process. It is better to
have something stable and standard than the current situation. I've been
a member of this group for over two years and at the rate at which
things have been happening, adding a new work item at this point could
add months to the completion date.

It would be nice to focus efforts on putting to bed what we have done -
I'm afraid I haven't had much time in the last 6 weeks to contribute to
this, but do we still have a valid work list of the things that are
currently outstanding?

Best,

Adrian.





  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]