Re: Sub/Not Security, Presence service identifiers

Jon,

When thinking about the question posed in

   http://www.imppwg.org/ml-archive/IMPP-WG/200208/msg00003.html

imagine that the subject that pres:[email protected] identifies is a
good and honorable MITRE employee who has had their laptop stolen.
You don't want to have presence service for all of MITRE subverted
just because one employee lost their laptop.  This demonstrates one
needs an identity for each presence service.

John

[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) writes:

> "Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> ...
> 
> > I also take it from recent list discussion that there is not a
> > demonstrated need for a presence service to have an explicit
> > identifier in a notify operation.
> 
> How do you expect a client to answer the question posed in
> 
>   http://www.imppwg.org/ml-archive/IMPP-WG/200208/msg00003.html
> 
> Which instant inbox are you going to use and why?
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]