RE: Sub/Not Security, Presence service identifiers

> > In a previous message, I think with
> > respect to the same example, you wrote
> >
> > "Signing the presence information by the person that created it does
> > not fix the problem, because a spoofing presence service could collect
> > signed presence information and replay them in an order that
> > misinforms the watcher."

[....]

> I'm afraid I don't know where I made this comment, however, [....]

http://impp.fujitsulabs.com/ml-archive/IMPP-WG/200208/msg00017.html

Note the date on this message: August 19th. I think if you're losing track
of arguments that you made two days ago, you need to stop sending new emails
for a while and collect your thoughts.

--Mark




  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]