Re: Presence service basics
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> writes: > It's hard for me to reconcile the above two sentences with section 2.1 of > 2778, which says > > The PRESENCE SERVICE has two distinct sets of "clients" (remember, > these may be combined in an implementation, but treated separately in > the model). One set of clients, called PRESENTITIES, provides > PRESENCE INFORMATION to be stored and distributed. The other set of > clients, called WATCHERS, receives PRESENCE INFORMATION from the > service. > > Somehow "clients" that "provide" or "receive" information don't seem very > much like "objects" that are "operated on" by "subjects." To me, the correspondence is clear. A client is both a subject and an object. When a client provides information, it is a subject. When a client receives information, it is an object. > I think it's fine to critique 2778 if it doesn't provide the tools/terms we > need to make progress on understanding your concerns. But let's critique it > for the model it actually describes, not substitute a different one as a > "summary." I don't think I substituted a different model. I just failed to point out that subjects and objects are clients. My model distinguishes the two roles performed by clients. John [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]