RE: Communication means in draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-05

Adrian wrote:
> Well, CPIM talks about this in section 2.2. If I am giving 
> someone my IM
> address, should it be necessary for me to tell them it is
> sip:[email protected]? What if my organisation changes to a 
> different
> protocol? Should I have to tell everyone again? CPIM includes the
> protocol resolution mechanism so that I can just use im:.

Instant Messaging as communication mean is not a good example here as it
is quite straightforward. If I want to publish it, it is logical to use
'im:' and no more status extension needed. 
Voice, video, chat or game are better examples as probably all of them
will have SIP contacts.

Regards,
Krisztian



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]