That's my point. The PIDF example below gives you nothing, no
information about what's open and what's closed. That's why we need more
info.
/Hisham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Adrian Bateman [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 6:05 PM
> To: Khartabil Hisham (NMP/Helsinki)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Communication means in draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-05
>
>
> On 30 August 2002 10:27, [email protected] wrote:
> > What meaningful information can you depict form this?
> >
> > <tuple id="a67uyt76">
> > <status>
> > <basic>open</basic>
> > </status>
> > </tuple>
> > <tuple id="432kljsd">
> > <status>
> > <basic>closed</basic>
> > </status>
> > </tuple>
>
> > > This doesn't mean anything to me - I'm confused about the
> > > point you are
> > > making. The contact address is optional to enable status
> > > values that are
> > > independent of address to be included - clearly <basic>
> doesn't fall
> > > into that case.
>
> Still nothing. As I say, <basic> wouldn't be used in this sense.
>
> Adrian.
>
[reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.