RE: Communication means in draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-05

On 30 August 2002 18:34, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> The logical conclusion of what Adrian is saying is that eventually
there ought to be a bunch of url schemes:
> 
> 	im:	for instant messaging
> 	voice:	for voice with email style addresses
> 	tel:	for voice with e.164 style addresses
> 	video:	for video
> 	game:	for gaming

Well, yes, or else you define a more sophisticated URI scheme that
conveys the information you want. Or you apply open/closed to the
contact address as a whole and extend this with application specific
status values.

Adrian.