RE: Comments on CPIM draft 03
Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 01:56 PM 9/11/2002 -0400, Peterson, Jon wrote: >I agree that the way the 'operations' in the core CPIM spec are currently >specified, it isn't clear if they are intended to suggest specific >requirements for elements that must be present in using protocols (your >protocol MUST implement a transaction identifier that is a unique token used >to match requests to responses), or merely to communicate more general That is because CPIM is not a protocol. The document does not specify bits over the wire. The CPIM document is a specification of gateway functionality. d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:[email protected]> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850 [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]