Re: Augmenting PIDF draft (Re: comments on draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-05)

Jon, 

> I agree - we are quite near the end of the discussions relevant to the PIDF
> specification (and those covering the core CPIM spec, I believe).

Yes.  I hope so, too. 

> I will put together a summary mail on the issues relating to PIDF that I've
> been tracking, and provide some textual proposals. A similar mail for CPIM
> material is also forthcoming.

That must be very helpful for us.

In particular, I expect that you could provide some texts on the Security
Considerations section.  I agree that the present texts is too weak to make
implementations interoperable for secure end-to-end presence exchange. 
I think your suggestion is very important. 

Thanks very much. 


-- Hiroyasu Sugano




  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]