Re: baseline CPIM security
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> writes: > That's not gatewaying. That's just plain old relaying. > > > >In other words, SIP or APEX or whatever provides it's envelope and > >transport mechanism and we gateway from one to another. > > Enveloping is what relay systems do. Translation is what gateways do. > Again: the difference is fundamental. I don't much care whether it is called gatewaying or relaying. All I want to do is send digitally signed messages and presence information between IMPP-compliant systems. Is that too much to ask? Besides, the requirements document implies to me that we must make this functionality available. I also would like to be able to sign subscription requests, but that is a topic on which discussion has been deferred. John [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]