Re: CPIM changes and XMPP
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:45:09 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Organization | TribalWise |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John,
Tuesday, November 5, 2002, 5:45:22 AM, you wrote:
John> I wonder why the issue of hop counts and loop detection is part of
John> the document on instant messaging. Don't we have to worry about the
John> same thing for subscription requests and notifications?
Yes. Looping is an issue for any store-and-forward service. If the
transfer service below does not do loop prevention, then looping is a
concern.
The real problem is that both of these are gateway specifications. For
maximum interoperability, a gateway spec needs to provide for only the core
mechanisms and information that will be common to all likely connected
service. Loop control is a long way from having the possibility of common
capabilities across all the services that are likely to connect through
either of these gateway mechanisms.
John> On another subject, I just read drafts from the Jabber Software
John> Foundation on the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP).
Sounds like you have some issues that should be discussed on the xmpp list.
John> What is the relation of XMPP to the IMPP working group?
Take a look at the working group's charter. Your question is answered
explicitly:
<http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/xmpp-charter.html>
d/
--
Dave Crocker <mailto:[email protected]>
TribalWise <http://www.tribalwise.com>
t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850
[reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]