Re: xml schema dateTime vs timestamp -> was -> RE: PIDF - using xml schema

Datetime allows for mixed-case identifiers?  That sounds like a
bug in Datetime..  It should be fixed-case.  Graham?

-derek

Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> writes:

> "Carr, Wayne" wrote:
> > 
> > After a quick look at both now, it looks like there may be an difference
> > that makes it so IMPP datetime isn't a subset of schema dateTime.  It
> > looks
> > like dateTime lets you use either 't' or 'T' and either 'z' or 'Z' and
> > xml
> > schema looks like it only lets you use 'Z' and 'T'.
> > 
> > If IMPP dateTime isn't a subset of schema dateTime, we'd have to use
> > string
> > or create the correct type in the schema.  A quick fix is to make it
> > string
> > and which is all a DTD would do.
> 
> I don't see the value in having a separate datetime which is *almost*
> the same as schemas, but not quite, especially if the difference is just
> syntactic. I would prefer to fix the impp date time spec to agree with
> the schema format.
> 
> -Jonathan R.
> 
> -- 
> Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.            72 Eagle Rock Avenue
> Chief Scientist                         First Floor
> dynamicsoft                             East Hanover, NJ 07936
> [email protected]                 FAX: (973) 952-5050
> http://www.jdrosen.net                  PH:  (973) 952-5000
> http://www.dynamicsoft.com
> 
> 
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]
> 

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       [email protected]                        PGP key available


  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]