Re: MSGFMT

Jon,

Thursday, November 14, 2002, 10:31:33 AM, you wrote:
Jon>   the litmus test for the quality 'new' is whether or not we have to
Jon> get the format past the IESG. In that sense the 822/XML work is 'new'.

whereas my own focus is on interoperability, deployability and use.

and lest anyone think that the above comment is simply an emotional indulgence, folks
should look over the archive of recent discussion.

you will discover that essentially none of the concerns i have been raising
are receiving any serious consideration and mostly are receiving no
consideration at all.

(interoperability and deployability have been ignored entirely. concern
about interconnecting with existing services has mostly been ignored, except
for stray comments with the basic view that we don't care enough to pay
attention to it.)

d/
-- 
 Dave Crocker  <mailto:[email protected]>
 TribalWise <http://www.tribalwise.com>
 t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850




  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]