RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
<[email protected]> Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:26:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Can it be Max-Forwards (with a dash)? Regards, Hisham > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Peterson, Jon [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:20 PM > To: 'Jonathan Rosenberg'; Adrian Bateman > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55) > > > > My plan following the meeting was to introduce in the CPIM spec a new > attribute of the message operation ('MaxForwards' is a good > name for it) > that contains such a decrementing integer. The semantics > would replace the > current section 3.4.2. A new release of the document with > this text will be > available before the end of this week. > > Jon Peterson > NeuStar, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 8:21 PM > > To: Adrian Bateman > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55) > > > > > > I thought consensus out of the meeting was to add them. I > > don't recall > > additional discussion on the list, or a specific proposal. > > > > I would propose: > > > > Max-Forwards: <count> > > > > where count is an integer. It gets decremented on each pass > through a > > gateway. > > > > -Jonathan R. > > > > Adrian Bateman wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I've been out of the loop (pun not intended, okay, it might have > > > been(!)) of the group for a while doing other things but I > > think I'm all > > > caught up now. I haven't seen any mention of the loop > > detection issue > > > since the minutes were posted. Was there a consensus that > > loop detection > > > was required and, if so, are there proposals about how > this will be > > > done? > > > > > > Adrian. > > > > > > On 25 November 2002 14:27, Mark Day wrote: > > > > > >>Discussion on Loop Detection: > > >> > > >>Jonathan Rosenberg - would be catastrophic to have a protocol > > >>without it. > > >> > > >>John Ramsdell - Would need this for NOTIFY as well > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical > > discussions, please] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave. > > Chief Scientist First Floor > > dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 > > [email protected] FAX: (973) 952-5050 > > http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000 > > http://www.dynamicsoft.com > > > > > > > > > > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical > > discussions, please] > > > > > > > > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical > discussions, please] > > > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]