RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)

<[email protected]> Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:26:17 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.impp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Can it be Max-Forwards (with a dash)?

Regards,
Hisham

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Peterson, Jon [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: 'Jonathan Rosenberg'; Adrian Bateman
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
> 
> 
> 
> My plan following the meeting was to introduce in the CPIM spec a new
> attribute of the message operation ('MaxForwards' is a good 
> name for it)
> that contains such a decrementing integer. The semantics 
> would replace the
> current section 3.4.2. A new release of the document with 
> this text will be
> available before the end of this week.
> 
> Jon Peterson
> NeuStar, Inc.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 8:21 PM
> > To: Adrian Bateman
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
> > 
> > 
> > I thought consensus out of the meeting was to add them. I 
> > don't recall 
> > additional discussion on the list, or a specific proposal.
> > 
> > I would propose:
> > 
> > Max-Forwards: <count>
> > 
> > where count is an integer. It gets decremented on each pass 
> through a 
> > gateway.
> > 
> > -Jonathan R.
> > 
> > Adrian Bateman wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > I've been out of the loop (pun not intended, okay, it might have
> > > been(!)) of the group for a while doing other things but I 
> > think I'm all
> > > caught up now. I haven't seen any mention of the loop 
> > detection issue
> > > since the minutes were posted. Was there a consensus that 
> > loop detection
> > > was required and, if so, are there proposals about how 
> this will be
> > > done?
> > > 
> > > Adrian.
> > > 
> > > On 25 November 2002 14:27, Mark Day wrote:
> > > 
> > >>Discussion on Loop Detection:
> > >>
> > >>Jonathan Rosenberg - would be catastrophic to have a protocol
> > >>without it.
> > >>
> > >>John Ramsdell - Would need this for NOTIFY as well
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> > discussions, please]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
> > Chief Scientist                             First Floor
> > dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
> > [email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
> > http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
> > http://www.dynamicsoft.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> > discussions, please]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> discussions, please]
> 
> 
> 



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]