RE: Attempt to summarize various threads

"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:09:04 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.impp
Organization VisionTech Limited
Message-ID <000801c29b64$0d3b9a40$6405010a@ADRIANXP>
Agreed.

On 03 December 2002 21:19, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> I agree on all points.
> 
> -Jonathan R.
> 
> Mark Day wrote:
> > Here's my attempt at summarizing the current state of discussions
and
> > apparent rough consensus:
[snip]
> > I think we end up needing small changes to CPIM and PIDF, plus
optional
> > non-normative explanations in CPIM-SRV.  In the absence of
objections from
> > the WG to this summary, the editors should go ahead and make those
changes
> > so we can move to WG last call on our docs.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > --Mark





  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]