RE: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01

Okay, that would probably work. Whether at this stage it has sufficient
merits to warrant a change in direction is another question. I can't say I
really feel strongly either way. Other opinions?

Jon Peterson
NeuStar, Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:41 PM
> To: Peterson, Jon
> Cc: 'Dave Crocker'; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
> 
> 
> Jon,
> 
> Thursday, January 9, 2003, 11:03:12 AM, you wrote:
> Jon> If you want to retain the concept that a subscription 
> operation with 0
> Jon> duration signifies either 'fetch' or 'unsubscribe', based on the
> Jon> subscription state at the recipient, you still need some 
> concept of starting
> Jon> and ending time.
> 
> why won't a time of epoch (the zeroth second, the beginning of time)
> suffice?
> 
> 
> If the semantic is "stop at time x" and x = 0, then it is 
> certain that the
> end time precedes the current time.
> 
> 
> d/
> -- 
>  Dave <mailto:[email protected]>
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>  t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> discussions, please]
> 
> 



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]