Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:09:49 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 11:33 AM 1/15/03 -0700, Thanos Diacakis wrote: >Graham, > >Would you mind elaborating on that point in the context of this thread? You got me there ;-) My response was somewhat at the level of a conditioned reflex, and I wasn't thinking clearly. In this case, if I'm understanding correctly, it's the initiator of a transaction who has to maintain context so the DoS issue doesn't arise. #g -- >Thanks > >Thanos > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Graham Klyne" <[email protected]> >To: "Dave Crocker" <[email protected]> >Cc: <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:41 AM >Subject: Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01 > > > > General agreement. > > > > If an application is forced to maintain context, that exposes a possible > > DoS attack. ------------------- Graham Klyne <[email protected]> [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]