Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01

Derek Atkins <[email protected]> 21 Jan 2003 15:38:52 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.impp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I see no reason why notifications cannot be "multicast", or at least
"multi-announced".  Similarly, I see no reason why I couldn't
subscribe to muliple presentities in one message...

Besides, I was mostly talking about syntax, not semantics.  Perhaps the
semantics are confusing, but the syntax I had in mind was definitely
of the form pres:xxx, pres:yyy -- if we decide to require only one
ID then obviously this point is moot.

-derek

"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> writes:

> I agree, I don't see any motivation in our requirements (2778/2779) for a
> single subscribe operation to target multiple discrete destinations. Doing
> so would surely complicate our security model in a number of ways.
> 
> Jon Peterson
> NeuStar, Inc.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 PM
> > To: Derek Atkins
> > Cc: Dave Crocker; Robert Sparks; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
> > 
> > 
> > I do not understand what the semantics of a SUBSCRIBE to such a thing 
> > would mean. Does it mean that two separate subscriptions are 
> > established, one to each address? Or, does it mean that there is some 
> > server that acts as an aggregator; it will act as a client 
> > and generate 
> > subscribes to each of the two addresses, and I will have a single 
> > subscription with that aggregator?
> > 
> > I don't recall much discussion on this point, and I think we 
> > will find 
> > there is a lot of complexity lurking here. Is there a good reason for 
> > keeping the #? Can't we just make it a single mailbox?
> > 
> > -Jonathan R.
> > 
> > Derek Atkins wrote:
> > > Dave Crocker <[email protected]> writes:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>Or do they, instead, want to permit:
> > >>
> > >>      pres:[email protected],pres:[email protected]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This is certainly what I envisioned, but I would like to 
> > see more comments
> > > from the the working group.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>In other words, we need to be very clear about the semantics of this
> > >>URL.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -derek
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
> > Chief Scientist                             First Floor
> > dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
> > [email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
> > http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
> > http://www.dynamicsoft.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical 
> > discussions, please]
> > 
> > 

-- 
       Derek Atkins
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
       [email protected]             www.ihtfp.com



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]