Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> 21 Jan 2003 15:38:52 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I see no reason why notifications cannot be "multicast", or at least "multi-announced". Similarly, I see no reason why I couldn't subscribe to muliple presentities in one message... Besides, I was mostly talking about syntax, not semantics. Perhaps the semantics are confusing, but the syntax I had in mind was definitely of the form pres:xxx, pres:yyy -- if we decide to require only one ID then obviously this point is moot. -derek "Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> writes: > I agree, I don't see any motivation in our requirements (2778/2779) for a > single subscribe operation to target multiple discrete destinations. Doing > so would surely complicate our security model in a number of ways. > > Jon Peterson > NeuStar, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jonathan Rosenberg [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:37 PM > > To: Derek Atkins > > Cc: Dave Crocker; Robert Sparks; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01 > > > > > > I do not understand what the semantics of a SUBSCRIBE to such a thing > > would mean. Does it mean that two separate subscriptions are > > established, one to each address? Or, does it mean that there is some > > server that acts as an aggregator; it will act as a client > > and generate > > subscribes to each of the two addresses, and I will have a single > > subscription with that aggregator? > > > > I don't recall much discussion on this point, and I think we > > will find > > there is a lot of complexity lurking here. Is there a good reason for > > keeping the #? Can't we just make it a single mailbox? > > > > -Jonathan R. > > > > Derek Atkins wrote: > > > Dave Crocker <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > > > > >>Or do they, instead, want to permit: > > >> > > >> pres:[email protected],pres:[email protected] > > > > > > > > > This is certainly what I envisioned, but I would like to > > see more comments > > > from the the working group. > > > > > > > > >>In other words, we need to be very clear about the semantics of this > > >>URL. > > > > > > > > > -derek > > > > > > > -- > > Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave. > > Chief Scientist First Floor > > dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 > > [email protected] FAX: (973) 952-5050 > > http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000 > > http://www.dynamicsoft.com > > > > > > > > > > > > [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical > > discussions, please] > > > > -- Derek Atkins Computer and Internet Security Consultant [email protected] www.ihtfp.com [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]