RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12))
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:59:29 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.impp |
|---|---|
| Organization | VisionTech Limited |
| Message-ID | <009701c2c646$ff134ae0$6405010a@ADRIANXP> |
On 24 January 2003 18:24, Peterson, Jon wrote: > > From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[email protected]] > > The value of the > > attribute MUST be a decimal number between 0 and 1 inclusive with > > at > > most 3 digits after the decimal point. Higher values > > indicate higher > > priority. Examples of priority values are 0, 0.021, 0.5, 1.00. > > > > << > > [[This is quite strange. Why not keep things simple? Instead of > > invoking fraction calculations (and representation), just specify > > the value to be an integer between 0 and 100. > > /d > > ]] > > >> > > I can't speak to the historical reasons why this was chosen, but this > couldn't be a show-stopper either way. I'd rather keep it as it is, > given the status of the document. Originally, we had integer values. This was changed to fall in line with the way priority works in other protocols - can't recall if it was HTTP or SIP or something else. Adrian.
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.1 KB) - not displayed