Re: "De facto charter" proposed text

yes, your statement of presentity and watcher activity is correct.

-derek

"sivaram" <[email protected]> writes:

> Thanx Thanos for replying. What u say makes sense for Ques1. For Ques2, I
> assume what u are saying is that the presence info is always sent to (&
> stored by) the local presence service. Watchers in other domains can
> subscribe & get notified whenever the presentity's presence info changes. In
> other words, presentities always talk to the presence service in the same
> domain whereas watchers can talk to presence service in other administrative
> domains as well.
> 
> It will definitely be useful if such info is put in the drafts (for people
> who haven't been following the group's activities).
> 
> Regds,
> Sivaram.

-- 
       Derek Atkins
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
       [email protected]             www.ihtfp.com



  [reminder: [email protected] for non-technical discussions, please]