RE: Outstanding issue with docsDevFilterIpSourcePortLow and similar MIB objects
"Matthew Schmitt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Perhaps it'd be simpler to just say that it only applies when the packet is TCP/UDP? That's essentially the way that it was worded in the RFI specification. Matt -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 10:21 AM To: DOCSIS OSS Majordomo List Cc: [email protected] Subject: Outstanding issue with docsDevFilterIpSourcePortLow and similar MIB objects Hi, We have noticed a discrepancy between the implementation of docsDevFilterIpSourcePortLow between different modems. The difference probably comes from that fact that what makes sense and what the specification says are different. The spec says: docsDevFilterIpSourcePortLow : If docsDevFilterIpProtocol is udp or tcp, this is the inclusive lower bound of the transport-layer source port range that is to be matched, otherwise it is ignored during matching. However, docsDevFilterIpProtocol can also be set to any (256), which is not listed above. This means that compliant CMs, should ignore docsDevFilterIpSourcePortLow when the Protocol is set to any. However, this does not seem to make much sense, as such interpretation makes the "any" value pretty much useless. Long time ago, this issue was brought up on the IPCDN reflector by other people. However, it seems it has never been resolved. I would like to propose an ECR to section 7.3.5 of the OSSI spec to clarify that docsDevFilterIpSourcePortLow and similar MIBs are also applicable when docsDevFilterIpProtocol is set to any (256) and the IP packet is either tcp or udp. Would there be an objection to this? Thanks, André NOTICE: This communication contains information which may be proprietary, privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy,retransmit, disseminate, disclose or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this communication in error and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _______________________________________________ IPCDN mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn