Re: Persistency description for docsDevCmNotifControl anddocsDevCmts NotifControl

Hi -

> From: "Nakanishi Greg-MGI8179" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ipcdn (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:23 AM
> Subject: [ipcdn] Persistency description for docsDevCmNotifControl anddocsDevCmts NotifControl
>

> I received a comment that there should be a description of persistency of the docsDevCmNotifControl
> and docsDevCmtsNotifControl objects in the Event Notification MIB.
>
> I added the following sentence to the description of both objects:
>
> "If the device is rebooted,the value of this object should revert to the default value."
>
> I'd like to solicit feedback on this, particularly if anyone disagrees with the sentence.
...

1) is the "should" meant as a "SHOULD"?

2) is the intent really to weakly prohibit persistence?

(I don't have a position, I'm just trying to understand.)

Randy