RE: Review of draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-mtamib-04.txt

Look fine to me too
Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Thaler [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 03:39
> To: Jean-Francois Mule; [email protected]
> Cc: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); [email protected]; C. M. Heard;
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-mtamib-04.txt
> 
> 
> Jean-Francois Mule writes:
> > To close on one additional comment:
> > Dave wrote:
> > > 12) pktcMtaDevErrorOid, pktcMtaDevErrorValue, etc:
> > >     why are OIDs of type SnmpAdminString rather than an
> > > OBJECT IDENTIFIER
> > >     type/subtype?  As is, the management station cannot do
> > > simple things
> > >     like expanding the OID into the defined string tokens in the
> MIB.
> [...]
> > So, the resolution is:
> >     - no object syntax change
> >     - change the description of the pktcMtaDevErrorOid to 
> indicate the
> > following:
> >          "Note that the syntax of this object is SnmpAdminString
> >           rather OBJECT IDENTIFIER because the object value is
> >           provided by an operator in the MTA configuration file
> >           in the form of a character string."
> >     - after more review of the pktcMtaDevErrorValue object, 
> we do not
> > believe the above text should be added to its description as this
> > pktcMtaDevErrorValue object may contain all kinds of object 
> values in
> the
> > case where the MTA can recognize the OID but cannot interpret the
> given
> > value.
> [...]
> 
> This resolution looks fine to me.
> 
> -Dave
>