RE: Review of draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-mtamib-04.txt
"Dave Thaler" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C9588551DE135A41AA2626CB645309370CBDCCAE@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> |
Jean-Francois Mule writes: > To close on one additional comment: > Dave wrote: > > 12) pktcMtaDevErrorOid, pktcMtaDevErrorValue, etc: > > why are OIDs of type SnmpAdminString rather than an > > OBJECT IDENTIFIER > > type/subtype? As is, the management station cannot do > > simple things > > like expanding the OID into the defined string tokens in the MIB. [...] > So, the resolution is: > - no object syntax change > - change the description of the pktcMtaDevErrorOid to indicate the > following: > "Note that the syntax of this object is SnmpAdminString > rather OBJECT IDENTIFIER because the object value is > provided by an operator in the MTA configuration file > in the form of a character string." > - after more review of the pktcMtaDevErrorValue object, we do not > believe the above text should be added to its description as this > pktcMtaDevErrorValue object may contain all kinds of object values in the > case where the MTA can recognize the OID but cannot interpret the given > value. [...] This resolution looks fine to me. -Dave