RE: [pkt-prov] MTA MIB Error OID table - a number of questions
"Eugene Nechamkin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <24CDBA67F085904999751B3C4F9E8C0B01E76CD7@NT-RMNA-0740.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> |
To address this concern, the last veraion of the description clause with the softer language allowing the locatlization has been introduced (see the latest e-mail exchange on the topic). Eugene. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 12:03 PM To: Jean-Francois Mule; [email protected] Cc: Eugene Nechamkin; PacketCable Provisioning and OSS Majordomo List; Leandro Rzezak Subject: RE: [ipcdn] [pkt-prov] MTA MIB Error OID table - a number of questions The problem I have with > must all be equal to > 'TOO MANY ERRORS IN THE CONFIGURATION FILE' is that nothing else in the DESCRIPTION clauses indicates that the text must be in English, and this introduces a MUST which is not localizable to other languages. -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Francois Mule [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 3:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; Dave Thaler; Sumanth Channabasappa; > PacketCable Provisioning and OSS Majordomo List; Leandro Rzezak > Subject: RE: [ipcdn] [pkt-prov] MTA MIB Error OID table - a number of > questions > > All, > > Eugene and I are updating the IETF IPCDN MTA MIB draft 06. > > We'd like to close one of the open items that did not get address in > the > draft05 released in October: pktcMtaDevErrorOidsTable and what MTA > behavior should be when the number of errors exceeds the table size > limit of 1024. > > Based on the input received, we'd like to propose the following: > 1. keep 1024 as a reasonable number of errors in a single config file > 2. if more than 1024 I had ping the list, >/dev/null": the MTA should > forget about any subsequent errors i.e. any error after 1024 does not > get stored in the table, and the last entry (1024th)'s is populated > with a reason indicating that there are more errors per the > suggestions received by Leandro and Sumanth on the list. > > Proposed text changes: > pktcMtaDevErrorOidIndex OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..1024) > MAX-ACCESS not-accessible > STATUS current > DESCRIPTION > " This object is the index of the MTA configuration error > table. It is an integer value which starts at value '1' > and is incremented for each encountered configuration > file error or warning. > If the number of configuration errors exceeds 1024, all > errors beyond the 1024th one must be ignored - these > subsequent errors are not reflected in the > pktcMtaDevErrorOidsTable. In this case, the value of the > pktcMtaDevErrorOid, pktcMtaDevErrorValue, and > pktcMtaDevErrorReason objects for the 1024-th table entry > must all be equal to > 'TOO MANY ERRORS IN THE CONFIGURATION FILE'." > ::= {pktcMtaDevErrorOidsEntry 1} > > > Let us know if this change is acceptable or else, feel free to propose > text improvements or suggestions. > Thanks, > Jean-François >