RE: Questions on SIG draft-08
"David De Reu" <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:36:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000201c570b3$d1821fb0$4805050a@pcdavid> |
> 1. pktcSigDevToneType currently defined as follows:
>
> pktcSigDevToneType OBJECT-TYPE
> SYNTAX INTEGER {
> busy(1),
> ........
> userDefined3(20),
> userDefined4(21)
> }
> MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
> STATUS current
...
> The object is defined as being "not-accessable".
This was also the case in previous versions of the draft,
and did not seem to cause trouble?
> 2. pktcSigDevToneNumFrequencies currently defined as
> follows:
>
> pktcSigDevToneNumFrequencies OBJECT-TYPE
> SYNTAX INTEGER(5..16)
> MAX-ACCESS read-write
> STATUS current
> DESCRIPTION
> "This MIB Object specifies the number of frequencies
> supported by the PacketCable MTA for each tone type."
> ::={ pktcSigDevConfigObjects 33}
>
> As there are multiple tone types defined in the SIG MIB
> draft-08 for MTAs, which one is being referred to in this
> object's description ? For exmaple, which tone type the
> value being set would correspond to ? Also, what if NMS
> tries to set the value of the number of frequencies NOT
> supported by the MTA ?
Although I'm not one of the authors of these objects, I
suppose that they meant that this would be a pre-configured
value to indicate the MTA's capabilities, i.e. to tell the
NMS how many frequencies the MTA supports at a maximum. If
this is indeed the case, then the object should not be
read-write, but read-only instead.
Regards,
David
_____________________________________________________
David De Reu
tComLabs
Stapelplein 70 - 9000 Ghent - Belgium
Tel: +32 9 269 22 91 - Fax: +32 9 329 31 74
www.tComLabs.com
_____________________________________________________