Re: TX-RX gain in Sig MIB Draft
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:06:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipcdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <003001c576df$cfb8b360$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Kumar, Satish" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:27 PM > Subject: [ipcdn] TX-RX gain in Sig MIB Draft ... > Question on pktcNcsEndPntConfigTxGain and pktcNcsEndPntConfigRxGain > > The MIB description is pasted below. There is no range of values defined > for these MIBs. Setting random values impact the devices badly. It is > good to retsrict these MIBs with specific range values. You're quite right. Also, in the case of pktcNcsEndPntConfigRxGain, a DEFVAL needs to be added. And there's the use of "recommended" when I'd expect "RECOMMENDED", which is stronger than what DEFVAL means per RFC 2578 section 7.9. A handy tool for checking these things is [email protected] Just send an email message (empty subject line) containing the extracted MIB module, (after replacing "XXX" dummy values) and it will send back a surprisingly useful analysis. It doesn't catch *everything*, but it certainly helps with all the easy stuff, and can be a big time saver. Randy