Re: TX-RX gain in Sig MIB Draft

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:06:47 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ipcdn
Message-ID <003001c576df$cfb8b360$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Hi -

> From: "Kumar, Satish" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:27 PM
> Subject: [ipcdn] TX-RX gain in Sig MIB Draft
...
> Question on pktcNcsEndPntConfigTxGain  and pktcNcsEndPntConfigRxGain
>
> The MIB description is pasted below. There is no range of values defined
> for these MIBs. Setting random values impact the devices badly. It is
> good to retsrict these MIBs with specific range values.

You're quite right.  Also, in the case of  pktcNcsEndPntConfigRxGain,
a DEFVAL needs to be added.  And there's the use of "recommended"
when I'd expect "RECOMMENDED", which is stronger than what DEFVAL
means per RFC 2578 section 7.9.

A handy tool for checking these things is [email protected]
Just send an email message (empty subject line) containing the
extracted MIB module, (after replacing "XXX" dummy values)
and it will send back a surprisingly useful analysis.  It doesn't
catch *everything*, but it certainly helps with all the easy stuff,
and can be a big time saver.

Randy