RE: Questions on SIG draft-08

Eugene,

Comments inline.



> This was also the case in previous
> versions of the draft, and did not seem to cause trouble? 
Correct, execept that the previous version (draft-07) had this object as
a part of the PktcSigDevToneEntry as an index, which is
"not-accessable". The value of INDEX is provided with the PDU as a part
an index part of the OID being quiried by the particular PDU.
[sumanth] 'pktcSigDevToneType' is an index into 'pktcSigDevToneTable'.
So it is still used as an index, no?


> ...this would be a pre-configured value to indicate the MTA's 
> capabilities, i.e. to tell the NMS how many frequencies the MTA 
> supports at a maximum. If this is indeed the case, then the object 
> should not be read-write, but read-only instead.
If this is the intention, then it's not aligned clearly with the
decsription clause. I think the intention of the object requires further
clarification.
[sumanth] This should have read 'maximum number of frequencies' and this
should probably be 'read-only' unless it can be changed at run-time.



Regards
Sumanth