Re: RE: AD re-review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2-13.txtTopic: docsIfCmtsQosProfilePermissions

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:12:06 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ipcdn
Message-ID	<00f601c5a92b$281b68e0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>

Hi -

> From: "Eduardo Cardona" <[email protected]>
> To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Ipcdn (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [ipcdn] RE: AD re-review: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2-13.txtTopic: docsIfCmtsQosProfilePermissions
>
> Will update :
>
>           Either createByManagement(0) or updateByManagement(1)
>           MUST be set when writing to this object.
...

Just checking: is the intent of this to prohibit setting both bits?
If it is permissible to set both bits, then this language isn't quite right,
an it might be better to say:
   Attempts to set both createByManagement(0) and updateByManagement(1)
   to zero MUST be rejected.

Randy