RE: MTA MIB draft06 - pktcMtaDevProvKerbRealmName - object SYNTAX - AD Comment 31

Thomas, 

The sentence you pointed out must not be the part of description as the
RealmTable is not indexed by the pktcMtaDevRealmTable but by the
pktcMtaDevRealmIndex instead (as you mentioned).

This sentence must be deleted from the DESCRIPTION clause of the
pktcMtaDevProvKerbRealmName MIB Object.

Eugene.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Thomas Anders
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 7:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ipcdn] MTA MIB draft06 - pktcMtaDevProvKerbRealmName - object
SYNTAX - AD Comment 31

Jean-Francois Mule wrote:
>>Proposed New MIB object def:
>>pktcMtaDevProvKerbRealmName  OBJECT-TYPE
>>       SYNTAX      SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..255))
>>       MAX-ACCESS  read-only
>>       STATUS      current
>>       DESCRIPTION
>>           " This object contains the name of the associated
>>             provisioning Kerberos realm acquired during the MTA4
>>             provisioning step (DHCP Ack) for SNMPv3 provisioning.
>>             This object value is used as an index into the
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>             pktcMtaDevRealmTable.
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Isn't pktcMtaDevRealmTable now indexed with pktcMtaDevRealmIndex instead??

    pktcMtaDevRealmEntry  OBJECT-TYPE
        SYNTAX      PktcMtaDevRealmEntry
        MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
        STATUS      current
        DESCRIPTION
            " This table entry object lists the MTA security parameters
              for a single Kerberos realm. The conceptual rows MUST NOT
              persist across MTA reboots."
        INDEX { pktcMtaDevRealmIndex }


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn